
A new study from UT Austin suggests that a common perception that it is harmful to teach children about historical racism in elementary school is wrong. The study found that white children who are taught about historical black figures who experienced racism are less likely to accept racial stereotypes.
To examine the consequences for white and African-American children of learning about historical racism, the researchers presented biographical lessons about 12 historical figures (six African Americans and six European Americans) to two groups of children ages 6-11.
For each group, some lessons provided information about racism, such as racially biased hiring practices and segregation, while others omitted this information. After the lessons, the children were interviewed about their racial attitudes and reactions, including guilt, defensiveness and anger.
Both white and black children who learned about racism were more likely to value racial fairness and to express greater satisfaction with the lesson. White children whose lessons included information on discrimination showed more defensiveness, had more racial guilt (if they were older than 7) and were less likely to accept stereotypical views about African Americans.
Who the hell thinks it’s wrong to teach kids about racism? They don’t need to see pictures of lynchings or watch Rosewood or do any of these stupid things, but they certainly need to know. Particularly when some of their parents are teaching them how to be racist at home.
Who thinks this is wrong? Honest answer is White multiculturalists and racists. They feel it’s not necessary to teach children about racism because it teaches them hatred.
Yeah but it’s okay to practically not say anything about the achievements/hardships of black people in this country (schools rarely speak about historical black accomplishments). What type of effect does that have on black kids?
It’s always white folks who subscribe to the “color-blind” theory of racism who protest the teaching of racism to children. :eyeroll: